Actions

Talk

Difference between revisions of "Social Psychology"

From Outscape Wiki

(Message to Jake)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
--[[User:Zathabar|Zathabar]] ([[User talk:Zathabar|talk]]) 11:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC) @ Jake
 
--[[User:Zathabar|Zathabar]] ([[User talk:Zathabar|talk]]) 11:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC) @ Jake
 
Tried to follow your excellent template sir. Please check me. However I think a manual link back tot he Tech root page would still be a useful browsing tool. The category link works of course but if a new to a wiki person sees a different page to the one they were led here from I feel it may confuse? Your opinion ?
 
Tried to follow your excellent template sir. Please check me. However I think a manual link back tot he Tech root page would still be a useful browsing tool. The category link works of course but if a new to a wiki person sees a different page to the one they were led here from I feel it may confuse? Your opinion ?
 +
: Hello Zathabar, glad the template was of use! I agree with having a link back to the master Technology page, but couldn't find a nice way to do it at the time. The issue I had was that the colour of links cannot be changed, which meant they were unreadable on dark backgrounds. I've updated the set of five infoboxes at [[Template:TechInfobox]] with a link back to the top of the master page. (Alternatively, it could link back to the relevant sub-section of the tree). Section templates for the rest of the tech page are there as well, so it should be easy to build new pages now. --[[User:SternguardJake]] ([[User talk:SternguardJake|talk]]) 17:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:25, 20 March 2019

--Zathabar (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC) @ Jake Tried to follow your excellent template sir. Please check me. However I think a manual link back tot he Tech root page would still be a useful browsing tool. The category link works of course but if a new to a wiki person sees a different page to the one they were led here from I feel it may confuse? Your opinion ?

Hello Zathabar, glad the template was of use! I agree with having a link back to the master Technology page, but couldn't find a nice way to do it at the time. The issue I had was that the colour of links cannot be changed, which meant they were unreadable on dark backgrounds. I've updated the set of five infoboxes at Template:TechInfobox with a link back to the top of the master page. (Alternatively, it could link back to the relevant sub-section of the tree). Section templates for the rest of the tech page are there as well, so it should be easy to build new pages now. --User:SternguardJake (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)